The Diversity of Qur’anic Exegetical Methodologies: A Descriptive-Analytical Study of Tafsir bi al-Ma’thur, bi al-Ra’y, and bi al-Ishari

Authors

  • Fadhiel Al Faizi Sultan Syarif Kasim State Islamic University Riau, Indonesia
  • Ulan Anggraini Sultan Syarif Kasim State Islamic University Riau, Indonesia
  • M Afirstda Khairupitio Sultan Syarif Kasim State Islamic University Riau, Indonesia
  • Riska Sawitri Sultan Syarif Kasim State Islamic University Riau, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64677/ppai.v3i1.401

Keywords:

Tafsir bil Ma’tsur, Tafsir bil Ra’yi, Tafsir bil Isyari, Qur’anic Interpretation, Islamic Exegesis

Abstract

This study examines three major approaches in Qur’anic interpretation: Tafsir bil Ma’tsur, Tafsir bil Ra’yi, and Tafsir bil Isyari. The issue addressed in this research is the diversity of interpretative methods used by Muslim scholars in understanding the Qur’an and how these approaches contribute to the development of Islamic scholarship. The purpose of this study is to describe the characteristics, sources, and methodological foundations of these three types of tafsir, as well as to analyze their roles in interpreting the meanings of the Qur’anic verses.This research employs a qualitative library research method. Data were collected through documentation and literature review from classical and contemporary Islamic scholarship, including books, journals, and authoritative works related to Qur’anic exegesis. The collected data were then analyzed using a descriptive-analytical approach to identify the differences and relationships among the three interpretative methods.The results of the research show that Tafsir bil Ma’tsur relies on transmitted sources such as the Qur’an, Hadith, and interpretations of the Companions and Tabi‘in. Tafsir bil Ra’yi emphasizes rational analysis and scholarly reasoning within the framework of Islamic principles, while Tafsir bil Isyari focuses on spiritual and inner meanings often associated with Sufi perspectives. In conclusion, these three approaches complement each other and enrich the understanding of the Qur’an from textual, rational, and spiritual dimensions

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Muhyi, Abdul, dan Ahmad Thib Raya. “Mengenal Ulumul Qur’an: Kunci Memahami Wahyu.” Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan 4, no. 3 (2026): 17668–17675.

Arif, Muhammad & Dwi Sukmanila Sayska. 2025. Tafsir Bi Ra’yi; Hukum dan Kedudukannya dalam Syariat Islam. ISME: Journal of Islamic Studies and Multidisciplinary Research, 3(1), 83–91.

Lumah, Diana Durrotul et al. 2025. How Did Imam At Thabari’s Interpretation with Tafsir bil Ma’tsur Style Influence Qur’anic Exegesis and Ulama During the Abbasid Dynasty Era? QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies, 4(1), 151–170.

Anisatul Faizah, Halimatussa’diyah & Rahmat Hidayat. 2025. Tiga Pilar Penafsiran Al Qur’an: Analisis Komparatif Metode Bi Al Ma’tsur, Bi Ar Ra’yi, Dan Bi Al Isyari Dalam Konteks Keilmuan Islam Kontemporer. Sujud: Jurnal Agama, Sosial dan Budaya, 2(1), 787 793.

Hasan, M. M., Ahmad, C., & Islam, M. R. 2025. Classical Insights, Contemporary Relevance: Understanding Tafsir bi al Mathur in Quranic Studies. Studia Quranika, 9(2), 155–178.

Izzan, A. (2020). Metodologi tafsir dan perkembangan tafsir al-Qur’an. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis, 21(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2020.2101-03

Nata, A. (2021). Tafsir isyari dalam perspektif tasawuf. Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 6(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.21043/jsqt.v6i1.9345

Nurman. (2023). Pendekatan Sufistik dalam Tafsir Isyari: Analisis terhadap Tafsir al-Tustari. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Hidayat, A., dkk. (2024). Metodologi Tafsir Al-Qur’an: Kajian Tafsir bil Ma’tsur, bil Ra’yi, dan bil Isyari. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Haris, Muslim. 2025. “Otoritas Tafsir bil Ma’tsur: Analisis Metodologi dan Epistemologi dalam Kajian Tafsir Klasik dan Modern.” Al-Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir.

Nirwana, Andri, Fahmi Arfan, Fahmi Dolles Marshal, Candra Maulana, dan Nazar Fadli. 2024. “Methods of Qur’an Research and Quran Tafseer Research: Its Implications for Contemporary Islamic Thought.” Bulletin of Islamic Research.

Rahayu, Tia, dan Alwizar. 2024. “Relevansi Sumber Tafsir Al-Qur’an: Perspektif Tafsir bi al-Ma’tsur, bi al-Ra’yi, dan bi al-Isyari.” Hamalatul Qur’an: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an 5(2).

Sabuni, M. A. (2019). Studi analisis kaidah asbab al-nuzul: Kelebihan dan kekurangannya. Al-Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 4(2), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.30868/at.v4i02.467

Shihab, M. Q. (2019). Pendekatan rasional dalam penafsiran al-Qur’an. Jurnal Ulumul Qur’an, 30(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.22373/uq.v30i2.5678

Siregar, R. (2020). Pendekatan sufistik dalam penafsiran al-Qur’an. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 28(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v28i2.10321

Supiana, S. (2023). Diskursus tafsir bi al-ma’tsur. Jurnal Dirosah Islamiyah, 5(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.47467/jdi.v5i1.2150

Published

01-06-2026

How to Cite

Al Faizi, F., Anggraini, U., Khairupitio, M. A., & Sawitri, R. (2026). The Diversity of Qur’anic Exegetical Methodologies: A Descriptive-Analytical Study of Tafsir bi al-Ma’thur, bi al-Ra’y, and bi al-Ishari: . Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 3(1), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.64677/ppai.v3i1.401