SILABUS PEMBELAJARAN

Authors

  • Malindung Capah STAI AL-IKHLAS DAIRI SIDIKALANG, SUMATERA UTARA

Keywords:

Silabus Pembelajaran

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the important role of the learning syllabus in improving the quality of education, including in terms of planning, evaluation, and adaptation to the development of the times. Qualitative methods are used to conduct an analysis of literature and educational practices related to the learning syllabus. These practices include educational standards, student progress evaluation, and learning planning. According to the study, the syllabus helps teachers organize learning systematically, improves the consistency of materials in the classroom, facilitates the evaluation of student progress, and provides flexibility to adapt to social and technological changes. The results show that creating a relevant and adaptable syllabus is a major step towards a successful education system. The syllabus must be continuously updated to meet the needs of the times and prepare students to face challenges around the world. Educators and education policy makers must commit to doing so.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach. 9th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction. Boston: Pearson.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Longman.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2014). The Systematic Design of Instruction. Boston: Pearson.

Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2017). Panduan Penyusunan Silabus Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (Eds.). (2013). Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation. New York: Routledge.

Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design Research from a Learning Design Perspective. Educational Designer, 1(1), 17–51.

Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Pearson Education.

Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture. (2013). Kurikulum 2013: Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory Action Research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Lee, J. F., & VanPatten, B. (2003). Making Communicative Language Teaching Happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Majid, A. (2011). Perencanaan Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Standar Kompetensi Guru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Marzano, R. J. (2007). The Art and Science of Teaching: A Comprehensive Framework for Effective Instruction. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012). Understanding by Design Framework. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Published

26-11-2024